4.7 Article

Heat transfer and friction factor correlations for an impinging air jets solar thermal collector with arc ribs on an absorber plate

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101523

关键词

Impinging jet; Solar energy; Jet diameter; Artificial neural network

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the thermal enhancement characteristics of a solar thermal collector roughened with single arc protrusion ribs. The results show that artificial roughness and jet impingement have a significant impact on the thermo-hydraulic performance of the collector.
The thermal enhancement characteristics of a solar thermal collector (STC) roughened with single arc protrusion ribs are investigated. Out of various techniques used for enhancing the performance of STC, jet impingement and artificial roughness (AR) have a dominant role in heat transfer augmentation. The impinging air jets STC is roughened with single arc protrusion ribs of different parametric values. The combined impact of artificial roughness and jet impingement on the thermo-hydraulic performance of STC is experimentally investigated. Reynolds number is varied from 4000 to 18,000 during experimentation. The AR parameters; relative height ratio of the rib is varied from 0.8 to 1.7, relative pitch ratio of the rib is varied from 9 to12, angle of arc protrusion rib from 40 degrees to 80 degrees, streamwise variation to d(hy) ratio (hydraulic diameter) is from 0.39 to 0.56 and spanwise variation to d(hy) ratio from 0.82 to 0.99 during experimentation. The parametric values of artificial roughness for the optimum thermo-hydraulic performance of 1.5, are found out to be relative height ratio of rib = 1.1, relative pitch ratio of rib = 10, angle of arc protrusion rib = 60 degrees, streamwise variation to d(hy) ratio = 0.43 and Span wise variation to d(hy) ratio = 0.86. Artificial neural network modeling of Nu(rs) - Nusselt number and f(f) - friction factor is also performed which accurately predicts these factors easily.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据