期刊
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103117
关键词
Wick solar stills; Corrugated wick solar still; Half barrel wick solar still; Nanoparticles; Thermal storage material; Desalination
资金
- Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University [2020/01/17122]
By adding wick material to the vertical sides of the half barrel and corrugated absorbers in the solar stills, the study managed to increase the evaporation/condensation rates of water and reduce heat losses, which led to a significant improvement in productivity. Furthermore, utilizing phase change material mixed with nanoparticles further enhanced the performance of the solar stills.
In this study, wick type solar stills with half barrel and corrugated absorbers were investigated. Three solar stills were fabricated: conventional solar still (SS), half barrel wick SS (BWSS), and corrugated wick SS (CWSS). As well known, the vertical sides of the SS have large area and high temperature due to the solar energy falling on these surfaces, and this high temperature area caused high energy losses to ambient. So, in this work, a wick material was added to the vertical sides of BWSS and CWSS from inside. The wick material helps to prevent the direct falling of solar energy on the SS vertical sides and maximizes the evaporation area of water. So, the heat losses are reduced, and the evaporation/condensation rates were increased. The results showed that the productivities of CWSS and BWSS were 43 % and 52 % greater than the conventional SS productivity, respectively. Additionally, adding vertical wick increased the productivities of CWSS and BWSS to be about 112 % and 123 % greater than that of conventional SS, respectively. For additional improvement in the performance of CWSS and BWSS, phase change material (PCM) mixed with nanoparticles (CuO) was employed beneath the absorbers. The experiments proved that the daily productivity of BWSS and CWSS was 154 % and 139 % over that of conventional SS, respectively. Also, the estimated cost per liter/thermal efficiency were 0.028 $/34 %, 0.022 $/55.5 % and 0.021 $/57 % for conventional SS, CWSS, and BWSS (with PCM and vertical wick), respectively.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据