4.7 Review

Issues and opportunities of manganese-based materials for enhanced Zn-ion storage performances

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 45, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103729

关键词

Zn-ion storage; Mn-based cathode materials; Nanostructure design; Functional modification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundationof China [51977097]
  2. Analytical and Testing Center in Huazhong University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) are an attractive alternative to lithium-ion batteries due to their low cost and high safety, but manganese-based materials used in ZIBs face challenges in cycling stability and rate capability. Various strategies have been developed to address these issues and provide new insights for designing high-performance ZIBs.
Owing to the low cost and high safety, aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) are one of the most attractive candidates to the post lithium-ion batteries. Among the reported cathode materials for ZIBs, manganese (Mn)-based materials hold high promise due to their abundant resources, various crystal structures, high operating voltages (>1.2 V) and decent reversible capacities (>200 mA h g(-1)). However, Mn-based materials suffer poor cycling stability and rate capability. To address these obstacles, various strategies have been developed and some progress has been achieved. In this review, an overview on the structural influence in the energy storage mechanisms and the challenges of Mn-based materials for aqueous ZIBs was given, and four main strategies including Mn2+ addition in electrolyte, structural adjustment, functional modification and architecture construction, are emphasized and discussed. Moreover, we analyze the advantages and disadvantages of these strategies, provide new insights for the design of high-performance Mn-based ZIBs, and sort out the applications and future opportunities of ZIBs in flexible energy storage devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据