4.7 Article

High surface activated carbon obtained from Uruguayan rice husk wastes for supercapacitor electrode applications: Correlation between physicochemical and electrochemical properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103494

关键词

Supercapacitor electrodes; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; High surface activated carbon; Pore size distribution; Biomass; Rice husk wastes valorization

资金

  1. Uruguayan Comision Academica de Pos-grado (CAP) -Udelar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that activated carbon prepared with longer carbonization time shows superior performance as supercapacitor electrodes, with higher specific capacitance values and better rate capability. These enhancements are likely attributed to its higher specific surface area, more open microporosity, and lower impurity content.
In this work, two different activated carbons were prepared from Uruguayan rice husk, using different carbonization times (1 and 4 h) and KOH as activating agent. The electrochemical characteristics as supercapacitor electrodes were evaluated in aqueous acidic media and correlated with their physicochemical properties, with special emphasis on the influence of the pore size. The activated carbon obtained with 4 h of carbonization time (CAct_4 h sample) presents the higher specific electrical capacitance value in three and two-electrode configuration, 248 F g(-1)@6.6 A g(-1) and 186 F g(-1)@0.9 A g(-1) respectively. This sample also showed the better rate capability and higher energy and power density (4.9 Wh kg(-1) at 192 W kg(-1)). Its best performance can be associated with its higher specific surface area (2412 m(2) g(-1)), more open microporosity (L-0 = 2.4 nm) and lower content of impurities. According to the equivalent electrical circuit model obtained from the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, this textural characteristics determine a higher charge storage and less electrochemical resistance related to the microporosity of the sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据