4.6 Review

The Mysterious Multitude: Structural Perspective on the Accessory Subunits of Respiratory Complex I

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.798353

关键词

mitochondrial complex I; oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS); accessory subunits; mitochondrial diseases; electron transport chain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review explores the possible functions of accessory subunits in mitochondrial Complex I (CI) and proposes a framework of experimentally testable hypotheses. Accessory subunits play important roles in CI assembly and function, and amino acid substitutions in these subunits may lead to CI deficiencies.
Complex I (CI) is the largest protein complex in the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation electron transport chain of the inner mitochondrial membrane and plays a key role in the transport of electrons from reduced substrates to molecular oxygen. CI is composed of 14 core subunits that are conserved across species and an increasing number of accessory subunits from bacteria to mammals. The fact that adding accessory subunits incurs costs of protein production and import suggests that these subunits play important physiological roles. Accordingly, knockout studies have demonstrated that accessory subunits are essential for CI assembly and function. Furthermore, clinical studies have shown that amino acid substitutions in accessory subunits lead to several debilitating and fatal CI deficiencies. Nevertheless, the specific roles of CI's accessory subunits have remained mysterious. In this review, we explore the possible roles of each of mammalian CI's 31 accessory subunits by integrating recent high-resolution CI structures with knockout, assembly, and clinical studies. Thus, we develop a framework of experimentally testable hypotheses for the function of the accessory subunits. We believe that this framework will provide inroads towards the complete understanding of mitochondrial CI physiology and help to develop strategies for the treatment of CI deficiencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据