4.3 Article

Puncture and localization for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with C-arm navigation: a randomized controlled cadaver trial

期刊

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-5844

关键词

C-arm navigation; 3D printing; percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD); learning curve; radiation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Project of China [81760401]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2016B090917001]
  3. Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201612019]
  4. Science and Technology Base and Talent Specialization of Guangxi [AD17129017, AD17195042]
  5. Science and Technology Project of Guigang City [1803002, 1834002]
  6. Science and Technology Plan Project of Maoming City [2020KJZX011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that puncture and localization for PELD assisted by C-arm navigation flattened the learning curve for junior surgeons compared to conventional methods and significantly improved the success rate of the first puncture. Additionally, PELD using C-arm navigation reduced surgery time and minimized radiation exposure risk for both patients and medical staff.
Background: Accurate preoperative puncture and localization is a key step in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). This study investigated the benefit of puncture and localization for PELD by C-arm navigation over conventional methods. Methods: Sixteen adult cadavers were randomly divided into two groups (group A defined as the C-arm navigation method, and group B defined as the conventional localization method). Two junior orthopedic surgeons who specialized in spinal surgeries were randomly allocated to each group. Conventional localization using C-arm fluoroscopy and localization using C-arm navigation were performed during the procedure. The intervertebral foramen on both sides at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 levels were punctured using the two methods. Technical parameters, such as fluoroscopy time, puncture time, overall time taken for puncture and localization, as well as the number of fluoroscopies, number of puncture attempts, and success rate of the first puncture were compared between the two methods. The learning curves were plotted for the two methods, and correlations between all technical parameters were analyzed. Results: Puncture and localization for PELD assisted by C-arm navigation had a flatter learning curve compared with the conventional localization method. The fluoroscopy, puncture, and total puncture-localization time for group A were 5.61 (+/- 1.37), 2.29 (+/- 1.22), and 9.78 (+/- 2.66) minutes compared with 15.72 (+/- 3.59), 4.87 (+/- 1.70), and 20.59 (+/- 4.79) minutes for group B, respectively (P<0.05). Fluoroscopy was used on average 5.15 (+/- 1.34) times in group A and 20.04 (+/- 5.05) times in group B (P<0.05). There was an average of 1.08 (+/- 0.28) puncture attempts in group A compared with 4.67 (+/- 1.88) attempts in group B (P<0.05). The success rate of the first puncture was 91.7% in group A and 10.4% in group B (P<0.05). Conclusions: Puncture and localization using C-arm navigation for PELD was shown to dramatically flatten the learning curve of junior surgeons and significantly improved the success rate of the first puncture. Moreover, PELD using C-arm navigation can minimize surgery time and the risk of radiation exposure for both patients and medical staff by reducing the number of fluoroscopies and puncture attempts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据