4.5 Article

Effects of white matter integrity and brain volumes on late life depression in the Framingham Heart Study

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gps.4469

关键词

white matter hyperintensities; brain; late life depression; longitudinal; Framingham Heart Study

资金

  1. Framingham Heart Study's National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-25195]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS-17950]
  3. NIA [AG-16495, AG-022476]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundIt is unclear whether brain white matter hyperintensities (WMHI) causes or is a result of late life depression. We used the Framingham Heart Study offspring to examine whether indices of brain aging are related to incident depression in the elderly. MethodsThe Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was administered along with a brain MRI scan at baseline and was re-administered (n=1212) at an average 6.6 0.6year follow-up. The outcomes (i) change in CES-D scores from baseline; (ii) depression defined as CES-D16; (iii) severe depression defined as CES-D21; and (iv) CES-D cutoff scores and/or on antidepressant were used. ResultsAmong those who did not have depression at baseline, 9.1% (n=110) developed depression, 4.0% (n=48) developed severe depressive symptoms, and 11.1% (n=135) were put on antidepressants. When depressive symptoms only was the outcome, we found that baseline WMHI was positively associated with change in CES-D scores and that those with an extensive WMHI at baseline had a high risk of developing severe depressive symptoms; the relationship was strengthened in the absence of cardiovascular diseases. In contrast, when depressive symptoms or taking antidepressant was the outcome, larger total cerebral brain volume and temporal lobe brain volume, but not WMHI, were negatively associated with the development of depression. ConclusionsBrain WMHI is a probable risk factor for vascular depression in the elderly. The depression outcomes with and without antidepressant were related to different brain pathologies. Copyright (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据