4.6 Article

Minimization of energy consumption by building shape optimization using an improved Manta-Ray Foraging Optimization algorithm

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 1068-1078

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.02.028

关键词

Building shape; RIUSKA; Improved Manta-Ray Foraging optimizer; LCC; Energy use minimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An optimization-simulation technique is applied for optimizing the envelope characteristics of buildings. Improved Manta-Ray Foraging Optimizer is considered as the optimization algorithm, along with RIUSKA for whole-building energy simulation. Buildings with trapezoid and rectangle shapes achieve the lowest life cycle cost under various climatic conditions.
For the optimization of envelope characteristics also the shape of the building, an optimization-simulation technique is applied in this paper. To obtain the best values of all related variables for the minimization of energy consumption in residential buildings, an improved Manta-Ray Foraging Optimizer is considered as the optimization algorithm. Also, for whole-building energy simulation, RIUSKA is used. The optimization parameters are the area and type of the windows, foundation, wall and roof insulations, level of infiltration, orientation, and thermal mass. Various forms of the building including rectangle, trapezoid, T-shape, H-shape, cross, L-shape, and U-shape are studied. The model optimization process takes fewer computation time and expense. Moreover, the utilized technique implements fully proper in comparison to the particle swarm, approximating very close to the optimum in less than 50% of the simulations The lowest life cycle cost is achieved by the buildings with trapezoid and rectangle form for five various climatic conditions. Also, the minimum variation from the optimum to the worst is observed by trapezoid and rectangle. The change in the values of the life cycle cost is lower than 4.5%. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据