4.6 Article

First Report of CC5-MRSA-IV-SCCfus Maltese Clone in Bat Guano

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9112264

关键词

Algeria; bat guano; Maltese clone; toxic shock syndrome toxin; ST149

资金

  1. INSERM [U1047]
  2. Campus France [17MDU980, 73-PROFAS B+]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study isolated 11 strains of Staphylococcus aureus from bat guano in Algeria, with 4 of them identified as MRSA isolates exhibiting resistance to multiple antibiotics and carrying different virulence genes. The results highlight the potential role of bat guano as an important reservoir of MRSA strains.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a widespread pathogen that could cause different illnesses in both human and animals. Presence of MRSA in animals raises concerns of their capacity to act as reservoirs, particularly in wild animals. This study aimed to characterize the resistance and virulence patterns of S. aureus strains isolated from bat guano in Algeria. From March to May 2016, 98 bat guano samples from Aokas's cave (Bejaia, Algeria) were collected. Swabs were taken for microbiological studies. Isolates were identified by Vitek(R) MS system, and antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion method. The clonal origin, virulence and antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates were characterized by whole genome sequencing. Eleven S. aureus strains were obtained from the 98 guano samples. Seven isolates were sensitive to all antibiotics tested and four (36.3%) were resistant to penicillin G, cefoxitin and fusidic acid. The four MRSA isolates were assigned to the sequence type ST149 and related to spa type t010. These isolates harbored a SCCmecIV element and the fusidic acid resistance element Q6GD50 (fusC). They carried different virulence genes including several enterotoxins (sea, egc enterotoxin locus, sec, sel), and the toxic shock syndrome toxin (tst). Our results highlight that bat guano may constitute an important reservoir of MRSA strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据