4.6 Article

Lactoferrin-Functionalized Noble Metal Nanoparticles as New Antivirals for HSV-2 Infection

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10010110

关键词

herpes simplex virus type 2; lactoferrin; genital herpes; nanoparticles; microbicide

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre [2018/31/B/NZ6/02606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LF-Ag/AuNPs demonstrate superior inhibition of HSV-2 entry and attachment in human keratinocytes compared to lactoferrin. They also exhibit immune-stimulant properties and reduce virus titers in infected mice tissues.
(1) Background: Lactoferrin has been recognized as a potent inhibitor of human herpetic viruses, such as herpes simplex type 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2). In this work, we tested if silver and gold nanoparticles modified with lactoferrin (LF-Ag/AuNPs) can become novel microbicides with additional adjuvant properties to treat genital herpes infection. (2) Methods: The antiviral and cytotoxic activities of LF-Ag/AuNPs were tested in human skin HaCaT and vaginal VK-2-E6/E7 keratinocytes. Viral titers and immune responses after treatment with LF-Ag/AuNPs were tested in murine vaginal HSV-2 infection. (3) Results: LF-Ag/AuNPs inhibited attachment and entry of HSV-2 in human keratinocytes much better than lactoferrin. Furthermore, pretreatment with LF-AgNPs led to protection from infection. Infected mice treated intravaginally with LF-Ag/AuNPs showed lower virus titers in the vaginal tissues and spinal cords in comparison to treatment with lactoferrin. Following treatment, vaginal tissues showed a significant increase in CD8+/granzyme B + T cells, NK cells and dendritic cells in comparison to NaCl-treated group. LF-Ag/AuNPs-treated animals also showed significantly better expression of IFN-gamma, CXCL9, CXCL10, and IL-1 beta in the vaginal tissues. (4) Conclusions: Our findings show that LF-Ag/AuNPs could become effective novel antiviral microbicides with immune-stimulant properties to be applied upon the mucosal tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据