4.6 Article

Comparative Characterization of CpCDPK1 and CpCDPK9, Two Potential Drug Targets against Cryptosporidiosis

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10020333

关键词

Cryptosporidium parvum; calcium-dependent protein kinase; protein expression; invasion; inhibitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32030109, U1901208]
  2. 111 Project [D20008]
  3. Innovation Team Project of Guangdong University [2019KCXTD001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the expression and function of CpCDPK1 and CpCDPK9 in Cryptosporidium parvum infection. The results suggest that these two proteins may have different roles in the infection process.
As the invasion, egress, and growth of Cryptosporidium spp. are regulated by the calcium ion, calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are considered potential drug targets against these pathogens. In this study, we expressed CpCDPK1 of Cryptosporidium parvum encoded by the cgd3_920 gene and CpCDPK9 encoded by the the cgd7_1260 gene in Escherichia coli, and we conducted some comparative studies with quantitative PCR, immunofluorescence staining, and in vitro neutralization assays. By immunofluorescence microscopy, CpCDPK1 was expressed over the entirety of the sporozoites, while CpCDPK9 was mainly expressed in the apical region. The expression of the cgd3_920 gene was the highest at 12 h of the in vitro culture, whereas the expression of the cgd7_1260 gene peaked between 2 h and 6 h. Polyclonal antibodies against these two CpCDPK proteins had similar neutralization efficiency on C. parvum growth, reaching approximately 40%. Of the 50 candidate compounds from the molecular docking of CpCDPK1, 10 had significant in vitro anti-cryptosporidial effects, but only one inhibited enzyme activity. For CpCDPK9, five of the forty-five candidate compounds showed significant in vitro anti-cryptosporidial effects. Results obtained from this study suggest that CpCDPK1 and CpCDPK9 might function differently in C. parvum infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据