4.6 Article

Plasmodium falciparum and Helminth Coinfections Increase IgE and Parasite-Specific IgG Responses

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.01109-21

关键词

antibodies; coinfection; helminths; IgE; IgG; luminex; malaria

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) - European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) from the European Union, through the Fondo de Investigacion para la Salud (FIS) [PI20/00866]
  2. Mundo Sano Foundation
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [PID2019-110810RB-I00, FPU2017/03390]
  4. Department of Health, Catalan Government [SLT006/17/00109]
  5. Government of Mozambique
  6. Spanish Agency for International Development (AECID)
  7. Fundacion Ramon Areces
  8. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023 Program [CEX2018-000806-S]
  9. Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co-infection with Plasmodium falciparum and helminths leads to higher levels of total IgE and antigen-specific IgG, indicating a broader immune response, potentially due to a more permissive immune environment in the host. Co-infection or co-exposure to Plasmodium falciparum and helminths is positively correlated, resulting in increased antibody responses. Children with co-infections may exhibit higher Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia.
Coinfection with Plasmodium falciparum and helminths may impact the immune response to these parasites because they induce different immune profiles. We studied the effects of coinfections on the antibody profile in a cohort of 715 Mozambican children and adults using the Luminex technology with a panel of 16 antigens from P. falciparum and 11 antigens from helminths (Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm, Trichuris trichiura, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Schistosoma spp.) and measured antigen-specific IgG and total IgE responses. We compared the antibody profile between groups defined by P. falciparum and helminth previous exposure (based on serology) and/or current infection (determined by microscopy and/or qPCR). In multivariable regression models adjusted by demographic, socioeconomic, water, and sanitation variables, individuals exposed/infected with P. falciparum and helminths had significantly higher total IgE and antigen-specific IgG levels, magnitude (sum of all levels) and breadth of response to both types of parasites compared to individuals exposed/ infected with only one type of parasite (P <= 0.05). There was a positive association between exposure/infection with P. falciparum and exposure/infection with helminths or the number of helminth species, and vice versa (P <= 0.001). In addition, children coexposed/coinfected tended (P = 0.062) to have higher P. falciparum parasitemia than those single exposed/infected. Our results suggest that an increase in the antibody responses in coexposed/coinfected individuals may reflect higher exposure and be due to a more permissive immune environment to infection in the host. IMPORTANCE Coinfection with Plasmodium falciparum and helminths may impact the immune response to these parasites because they induce different immune profiles. We compared the antibody profile between groups of Mozambican individuals defined by P. falciparum and helminth previous exposure and/or current infection. Our results show a significant increase in antibody responses in individuals coexposed/coinfected with P. falciparum and helminths in comparison with individuals exposed/infected with only one of these parasites, and suggest that this increase is due to a more permissive immune environment to infection in the host. Importantly, this study takes previous exposure into account, which is particularly relevant in endemic areas where continuous infections imprint and shape the immune system. Deciphering the implications of coinfections deserves attention because accounting for the real interactions that occur in nature could improve the design of integrated disease control strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据