4.7 Article

Trapping light in a Floquet topological photonic insulator by Floquet defect mode resonance

期刊

APL PHOTONICS
卷 6, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0061950

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the manipulation of phase change in Floquet photonic insulators by perturbing the driving sequence, leading to the induction of resonance effects and the emergence of Floquet Defect Mode Resonance (FDMR); the localized pattern of this resonance is determined by the driving sequence and differs in topologically trivial and nontrivial lattices.
Floquet topological photonic insulators characterized by periodically varying Hamiltonians are known to exhibit much richer topological behaviors than static systems. In a Floquet insulator, the phase evolution of the Floquet-Bloch modes plays a crucial role in determining its topological behaviors. Here, we show that by perturbing the driving sequence, it is possible to manipulate the cyclic phase change in the system over each evolution period to induce self-interference of a bulk mode, leading to a resonance effect, which can be regarded as a Floquet counterpart of defect-mode resonance in static lattices. This Floquet Defect Mode Resonance (FDMR) is cavity-less since it does not require physical boundaries; its spatial localization pattern is, instead, determined by the driving sequence and is found to be different in topologically trivial and nontrivial lattices. We demonstrated excitation of FDMRs by edge modes in a Floquet octagon lattice on silicon-on-insulator, achieving extrinsic quality factors greater than 10(4). Imaging of the scattered light pattern directly revealed the hopping sequence of the Floquet system and confirmed the spatial localization of FDMR in a bulk-mode loop. The new Floquet topological resonator could find various applications in lasers, optical filters and switches, nonlinear cavity optics, and quantum optics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据