4.7 Article

Easy-to-Use HPLC Method to Measure Intracellular Ascorbic Acid Levels in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and in Plasma

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox11010134

关键词

ascorbic acid; vitamin C; peripheral blood mononuclear cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the growing interest in ascorbic acid (AA), a method to measure AA levels in the human body is needed. This study presents a method using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) to measure AA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The method is also applicable to plasma and other leukocyte subsets. The study found that the method is reliable and accurate in measuring AA in PBMCs and plasma.
Given the growing interest in ascorbic acid (AA), there is a need for a reliable and reproducible method to measure AA status in the human body. Serum AA concentrations do not correlate well with tissue levels, but AA levels in leukocytes do. However, a standard method for clinical application is lacking. This present study describes a method to measure AA in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC). The method can also be used in plasma and other leukocyte subsets. The measurements of AA in PBMCs and plasma were performed with HPLC with HILIC separation and UV detection. The sample preparation involved the isolation of PBMCs and lysis and precipitation with acetonitrile. European Medicine Agency guidelines for bioanalytic method validation were followed for the evaluation. A highly precise execution of the method was found with intra- and inter-assay variations at a maximum of 7.8%. In 40 healthy donors, a mean intracellular AA concentration of 7.9 microgram/10(8) cells was found in PBMCs. A correlation between plasma and PBMC AA concentration was not present (r = 0.22). In conclusion, we developed a convenient, reliable, and reproducible method for the quantitative determination of AA within PBMCs and plasma from human blood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据