4.7 Article

Stabilization of PE with Pomegranate Extract: Contradictions and Possible Mechanisms

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox11020418

关键词

natural antioxidants; natural extract; pomegranate; stabilization; long chain branching; mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the processing stabilization efficiency of pomegranate peel extract on polyethylene was investigated. The results showed that while the extract improved the processing stabilization, it had a negative impact on the long-term stability. This could be attributed to chemical factors and the lack of necessary reactive hydrogens.
Dry pomegranate peel was extracted with acetone and the extract was added to a Phillips type polyethylene. The concentration of the extract was changed from 0 to 1000 ppm in six steps and stabilization efficiency was checked by the multiple extrusion of the polymer followed by the characterization of chemical structure, processing, and residual stability. The results confirmed the excellent processing stabilization efficiency of the extract, but also the poor long-term stability of PE containing it in accordance with previously published results. The extract is amorphous and its solubility is relatively large in the polymer; thus, these factors cannot be the reason for the poor stabilization efficiency in an oxygen-rich environment. Chemical factors like the self-interaction of the polyphenol molecules, the stability of the radicals forming after hydrogen abstraction, and the lack of hydrogens with the necessary reactivity must be considered during the evaluation of the efficiency of the extract. These factors as well as the insufficient number of active hydrogens hinder the reaction of the additive molecules with oxygen-centered radicals, thus leading to inferior long-term stability. The extract can be used for the processing stabilization of polymers, but for applications requiring long-term stability, it must be combined with other natural antioxidants like flavonoids or Vitamin E.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据