4.7 Article

Oleuropein Degradation Kinetics in Olive Leaf and Its Aqueous Extracts

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox10121963

关键词

by-product; kinetics; liquid extract; oleuropein; olive leaves; storage

资金

  1. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha [2019-PREDUCLM]
  2. Government of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain)
  3. FEDER [SBPLY/17/180501/000191]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to determine the stability of oleuropein in olive leaves under different conditions. Results showed that the degradation of oleuropein followed first-order kinetics, with olive leaf powder stored at relative humidity >=57% showing greater stability after six months. This is an encouraging result for the storage and transformation of olive leaves waste in oil mills.
Although olives leaves are currently considered a waste material from oil mills, they have great potential to be transformed into by-products due to their high oleuropein content. Oleuropein is a glycoside precursor of hydroxytyrosol, which is the phenolic compound with the highest antioxidant capacity in nature and which is associated with multiple health benefits. For this reason, the demand for oleuropein is growing in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic and food sectors. The objective of this study is to determine the stability of oleuropein in olive leaves from oil mills in solid and aqueous forms under different conditions of temperature, relative humidity and lighting. The results indicate that the degradation of oleuropein conforms well to first-order kinetics. The rate constants at the temperatures tested in the aqueous extracts indicate activation energies from RTl to 80 degrees C and from 7 degrees C to 14 degrees C, as the degradation reactions were different in these ranges. Furthermore, olive leaf powder stored at any temperature with an RH >= 57% showed greater stability after six months, which is an encouraging result for the storage and transformation of this waste in oil mills.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据