4.7 Article

Method Validation and Characterization of the Associated Uncertainty for Malondialdehyde Quantification in Exhaled Breath Condensate

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox10111661

关键词

malondialdehyde; oxidative stress biomarkers; uncertainty; exhaled breath condensate

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [IZCOZ0_177067]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [IZCOZ0_177067] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study optimized a method based on 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine for quantifying MDA in EBC, with analytical uncertainty at the LOQ level reaching 23%, yet still lower than the observed inter-individual variability.
There are several methods for quantifying malondialdehyde (MDA), an oxidative stress biomarker, in exhaled breath condensate (EBC). However, due to the very diluted nature of this biological matrix, a high variability is observed at low concentrations. We aimed to optimize a 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine-based method using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry and characterize the uncertainty associated with this method. We investigated the following parameters for the method validation: calibration linearity, limit of detection (LOD), precision, recovery, and matrix effect. The results were used to identify the main sources of uncertainty and calculating the combined uncertainty. The applicability of this method was evaluated in an ongoing epidemiological study by analyzing 164 EBC samples collected from different professional groups in subway environments. The optimized method was sensitive (LOD: 70 pg/mL), precise (inter-day variation < 19%) and accurate (recovery range: 92-106.5%). The calculated analytical uncertainty was the highest at the LOQ level and reached 23%. Although the analytical uncertainty was high at low MDA concentrations, it was significantly lower than that the observed inter-individual variability. Hence, this method performs sufficiently well and can be recommended for future use in epidemiological researches relying on between-subject differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据