4.7 Review

The Role of Vitamin C in Cancer Prevention and Therapy: A Literature Review

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox10121894

关键词

ascorbic acid; vitamin C; cancer; clinical trial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin C plays a significant role in cancer prevention and treatment, with studies showing its potential benefits in preventing pulmonary and breast cancer, as well as its synergistic effects with pancreatic cancer drugs. However, a Mendelian randomized study did not find an association between vitamin C and cancer prevention. Ongoing research is needed to further explore the therapeutic role of vitamin C in cancer through new phase II and III clinical trials.
Vitamin C is a water-soluble antioxidant associated with the prevention of the common cold and is also a cofactor of hydrolases that participate in the synthesis of collagen and catecholamines, and in the regulation of gene expression. In cancer, vitamin C is associated with prevention, progression, and treatment, due to its general properties or its role as a pro-oxidant at high concentration. This review explores the role of vitamin C in cancer clinical trials and the aspects to consider in future studies, such as plasmatic vitamin C and metabolite excretion recording, and metabolism and transport of vitamin C into cancer cells. The reviewed studies show that vitamin C intake from natural sources can prevent the development of pulmonary and breast cancer, and that vitamin C synergizes with gemcitabine and erlotinib in pancreatic cancer. In vitro assays reveal that vitamin C synergizes with DNA-methyl transferase inhibitors. However, vitamin C was not associated with cancer prevention in a Mendelian randomized study. In conclusion, the role of vitamin C in the prevention and treatment of cancer is still an ongoing area of research. It is necessary that new phase II and III clinical trials be performed to collect stronger evidence of the therapeutic role of vitamin C in cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据