4.7 Article

Understanding on corrosion mechanism of oxidized AZW800 alloy in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNESIUM AND ALLOYS
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 1740-1753

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.015

关键词

AZW800; Corrosion behavior; Oxide layer; EIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of oxide layer on the corrosion behavior of AZW800 alloy was investigated. The results showed that the oxide layer could hinder corrosion in the initial immersion period but aggravated corrosion occurred later due to defects of the oxide layer. Additionally, the oxide layer eliminated the micro-galvanic couple on the alloy surface.
Magnesium alloys are more widely used at higher temperatures. However, it is not well known whether oxide layer, produced at high temperature, could show corrosion protection. Thus, the corrosion behaviors of oxidized AZW800 alloy were investigated by hydrogen evolution and electrochemical measurements to evaluate effect of oxide layer on corrosion resistance. The results showed that corrosion of removed oxide layer AZW800 alloy showed characteristic of localized corrosion, leaving randomly bulky pits. While reserved oxide layer AZW800 alloy exhibited a relatively uniform corrosion. The results indicated that oxide layer could hinder corrosion of oxidized AZW800 alloy in the initial period of immersion. While subsequently, aggravated corrosion would occur owing to defects of oxide layer and less protective products film. Besides, present of oxide layer eliminated micro-galvanic couple on alloy surface. The synergistic effect of elimination of micro-galvanic couple on alloy surface and alkalization effect transforms localized corrosion into relatively uniform corrosion of alloys.& COPY; 2021 Chongqing University. Publishing services provided by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) Peer review under responsibility of Chongqing University

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据