4.7 Review

Liver Regeneration and Cell Transplantation for End-Stage Liver Disease

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom11121907

关键词

end-stage liver disease; liver regeneration; massive hepatic necrosis; liver progenitor cells; cell transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver transplantation is the only curative option for end-stage liver disease, but limitations exist, prompting the need for research into alternative options. Liver regeneration, divided into hepatocyte-driven and liver progenitor cell-driven categories, shows promise as a therapeutic strategy for end-stage liver disease.
Liver transplantation is the only curative option for end-stage liver disease; however, the limitations of liver transplantation require further research into other alternatives. Considering that liver regeneration is prevalent in liver injury settings, regenerative medicine is suggested as a promising therapeutic strategy for end-stage liver disease. Upon the source of regenerating hepatocytes, liver regeneration could be divided into two categories: hepatocyte-driven liver regeneration (typical regeneration) and liver progenitor cell-driven liver regeneration (alternative regeneration). Due to the massive loss of hepatocytes, the alternative regeneration plays a vital role in end-stage liver disease. Advances in knowledge of liver regeneration and tissue engineering have accelerated the progress of regenerative medicine strategies for end-stage liver disease. In this article, we generally reviewed the recent findings and current knowledge of liver regeneration, mainly regarding aspects of the histological basis of regeneration, histogenesis and mechanisms of hepatocytes' regeneration. In addition, this review provides an update on the regenerative medicine strategies for end-stage liver disease. We conclude that regenerative medicine is a promising therapeutic strategy for end-stage liver disease. However, further studies are still required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据