4.7 Article

Protease-Based Subunit Vaccine in Mice Boosts BCG Protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

期刊

VACCINES
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020306

关键词

tuberculosis; subunit vaccine; PepN; PepA; Mtb32a; Msh1; recombinant BCG; adjuvant; Advax4

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq, Brazil [303671/2019-0, 314366/2020-2, 421867/2018-3, 406868/2016-6]
  2. CAPES-Coordenacao de Apefeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior, Brazil [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new tuberculosis vaccine PEPf was developed, which can reduce lung bacterial load and improve protection. Combining PEPf with the Advax4 adjuvant and using a prime-boost strategy as a subunit vaccine significantly enhances protection.
The significant number of people with latent and active tuberculosis infection requires further efforts to develop new vaccines or improve the Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), which is the only approved vaccine against this disease. In this study, we developed a recombinant fusion protein (PEPf) containing high-density immunodominant epitope sequences from Rv0125, Rv2467, and Rv2672 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) proteases that proved immunogenic and used it to develop a recombinant BCG vaccine expressing the fusion protein. After challenging using Mtb, a specific immune response was recalled, resulting in a reduced lung bacterial load with similar protective capabilities to BCG. Thus BCG PEPf failed to increase the protection conferred by BCG. The PEPf was combined with Advax4 adjuvant and tested as a subunit vaccine using a prime-boost strategy. PEPf + Advax4 significantly improved protection after Mtb challenge, with a reduction in bacterial load in the lungs. Our results confirm that Mtb proteases can be used to develop vaccines against tuberculosis and that the use of the recombinant PEPf subunit protein following a prime-boost regimen is a promising strategy to improve BCG immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据