4.7 Article

Immunogenicity of Multi-Target Chimeric RHDV Virus-like Particles Delivering Foreign B-Cell Epitopes

期刊

VACCINES
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020229

关键词

virus-like particles (VLPs); chimeric VLPs; nanoparticles; vaccine platform; multivalent vaccine; RHDV; FCV; CPV; B-cell epitope

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The RHDV-based engineered VLPs have shown potential as efficient multivalent vaccines capable of delivering different foreign B-cell antigens simultaneously. The bivalent chimeric VLPs induced a strong and balanced antibody response towards the target epitopes tested.
The rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) vaccine platform is a nanoparticle composed of 180 copies of the viral capsid protein, VP60, self-assembled into virus-like particles (VLPs). RHDV VLPs are able to accept the simultaneous incorporation of target epitopes at different insertion sites. The resulting chimeric RHDV VLPs displaying immunogenic foreign antigens have been shown to induce specific protective immune responses against inserted heterologous T-cytotoxic and B-cell epitopes in the mouse and pig models. In this study, we explored whether RHDV-based engineered VLPs can be developed as efficient multivalent vaccines co-delivering different foreign B-cell antigens. We generated bivalent chimeric RHDV VLPs displaying two model B-cell epitopes at different surface-exposed insertion sites, as well as the corresponding monovalent chimeric VLPs. The immunogenic potential of the bivalent chimeric VLPs versus the monovalent constructs was assessed in the mouse model. We found that the bivalent chimeric VLPs elicited a strong and balanced antibody response towards the two target epitopes tested, although slight reductions were observed in the levels of specific serum antibody titers induced by bivalent chimeric VLPs as compared with the corresponding monovalent constructs. These results suggest that RHDV VLPs could represent a promising platform for the development of efficient multivalent vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据