4.7 Article

Evaluation of a Virus-like Nanoparticle Porcine Circovirus Type-2 (PCV2) Capsid Protein Fused with the Pig Immunoglobulin Fc Fragment as a Novel Vaccine Candidate against PCV2 in Mice

期刊

VACCINES
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9101128

关键词

PCV2; capsid ( increment 1-41aa)-pFc fusion protein; virus-like nanoparticles

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [19441912100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The engineered PCV2 truncated capsid subunit Fc-fusion protein induced both cellular and humoral immune responses in mice, showing great potential for applications.
Porcine circovirus Type 2 (PCV2) is a primary etiological pathogen of post-weaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). The capsid protein of PCV2 is the crucial immunogenic protein which can induce antibody generation and immune responses. However, there is still a lack of efficient PCV2 vaccines with high immunogenicity. In the current study, we developed a novel engineered PCV2 capsid ( increment 1-41aa)-pFc fusion protein (PCFP), which comprised a truncated capsid protein of PCV2 and a porcine IgG Fc fragment, fused to the capsid protein of PCV2 at the C-terminus. We found that this novel fusion protein could auto-assemble into virus-like nanoparticles with an estimated mean diameter of 22.6 nm, characterized by transmission electron microscopy. Immunization of BALB/c mice with this fusion protein significantly increased the production levels of anti-PCV2-capsid protein antibody in serum. Besides, the virus-like nanoparticles, PCFP was demonstrated to induce efficient cellular immune responses in mice, as evident by the high specific T cell reactivity to the PCFP fusion protein and the high production of the immune cytokines IFN-gamma and IL-10 in an ex vivo re-stimulation system. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the PCV2 truncated capsid subunit Fc-fusion protein can induce both cellular and humoral immune responses, and it displays great application potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据