4.5 Article

Sex and gender in respiratory physiology

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW
卷 30, 期 162, 页码 -

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0038-2021

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sex is a biological concept determined at conception, while gender is a social concept. Sex plays a significant role in respiratory physiology, with females having smaller dimensions in the respiratory system and sex hormones playing specific roles in lung inflammatory processes, breathing control, and disease response. Due to research predominantly focusing on males, evidence-based medicine for women is relatively lacking. The increasing number of transgender individuals presents new challenges for clinicians due to anatomical and physiological changes they undergo.
Sex is a biological concept determined at conception. Gender is a social concept. Medicine recognises sex as a biological variable and recommends including sex as a factor in clinical practice norms and as a topic of bench and clinical research. Sex plays a role in respiratory physiology according to two pathways: hormones and anatomy, with females characterised by smaller dimensions at every level of the respiratory system. Sex hormones also play specific roles in lung inflammatory processes, breathing control and in response to diseases. The literature is extremely controversial because many factors need to be considered to avoid erroneous comparisons. The main difficulty lies in creating homogeneous groups of subjects according to age, body weight, lung/airway size, fluctuations in circulating hormone levels, and exercise protocol. Because almost all of the knowledge available in physiology is based on research in males, medicine for women is therefore less evidence-based than that being applied to men. Finally, the number of transsexual people is increasing and they represent new challenges for clinicians, due to the anatomical and physiological changes that they undergo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据