4.7 Review

Current Knowledge on Polyethylene Terephthalate Degradation by Genetically Modified Microorganisms

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.771133

关键词

plastic degradation; genetic engineering; microorganisms; PET; protein

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [UMO-2017/27/B/NZ9/02218]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global production of PET is estimated to reach 87.16 million metric tons by 2022, with a significant portion accumulating in the environment as waste. Genetically modified microorganisms have become a promising alternative for the degradation of PET to address the issue of uncontrolled pollution. Studies have focused on improving microbial capacity for PET degradation through metabolic and protein engineering, particularly targeting enzymes like PETase, MHETase, and cutinase.
The global production of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is estimated to reach 87.16 million metric tons by 2022. After a single use, a remarkable part of PET is accumulated in the natural environment as plastic waste. Due to high hydrophobicity and high molecular weight, PET is hardly biodegraded by wild-type microorganisms. To solve the global problem of uncontrolled pollution by PET, the degradation of plastic by genetically modified microorganisms has become a promising alternative for the plastic circular economy. In recent years many studies have been conducted to improve the microbial capacity for PET degradation. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about metabolic engineering of microorganisms and protein engineering for increased biodegradation of PET. The focus is on mutations introduced to the enzymes of the hydrolase class-PETase, MHETase and cutinase-which in the last few years have attracted growing interest for the PET degradation processes. The modifications described in this work summarize the results obtained so far on the hydrolysis of polyethylene terephthalate based on the released degradation products of this polymer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据