4.7 Article

Left Ventricular Flow Distribution as a Novel Flow Biomarker in Atrial Fibrillation

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.725121

关键词

4D-flow MRI; flow distribution; magnetic resoance imaging; direct flow; arial fibrillation

资金

  1. University of Calgary, URGC SEM [1054341]
  2. Biomedical Engineering graduate program
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada/Conseil de recherche en science naturelles et en genie du Canada [RGPIN-2020-04549, DGECR-2020-00204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) demonstrated a reduced fraction of direct flow and an increase in delayed ejection compared to healthy controls.
Introduction: Four-dimensional (4-D) flow cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can be used to elegantly describe the hemodynamic efficiency of left ventricular (LV) flow throughout the cardiac cycle. Patients with nonvalvular paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) may have occult LV disease. Flow distribution analysis, based on 4-D flow, may unmask the presence of LV disease by assessing flow components: direct flow, retained flow, delayed ejection, and residual volume. This study aimed to identify LV hemodynamic inefficiencies in patients with PAF and normal systolic function. We hypothesized that the fraction of direct flow to the total end-diastolic volume would be reduced in patients with PAF compared with controls.Methods: We used 4-D LV flow component analysis to compare hemodynamics in 30 healthy controls and 50 PAF patients in sinus rhythm.Results: PAF subjects and healthy controls had similar LV mass, volume, and ejection fraction. Direct flow was lower in the PAF group than in the controls (44.5 +/- 11.2% vs. 50.0 +/- 12.2%, p = 0.042) while delayed ejection was higher in the PAF group (21.6 +/- 5.6% vs. 18.6 +/- 5.7%, p = 0.022).Conclusion: PAF patients demonstrated a relative reduction in direct flow and elevation in delayed ejection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据