4.7 Article

Activated Platelets Autocrine 5-Hydroxytryptophan Aggravates Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury by Promoting Neutrophils Extracellular Traps Formation

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.777989

关键词

sepsis; acute lung injury (ALI); 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT); neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs); neutrophil; platelet

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that peripheral 5-HT deficiency can reduce NET formation, alleviate lung inflammation and reduce mortality in sepsis-induced acute lung injury (ALI). It was also found that peripheral 5-HT deficiency can reduce the accumulation of platelets and NETs in the lungs of septic mice. The study uncovers a mechanism by which peripheral 5-HT aggravates sepsis-induced ALI by promoting NET formation in the lungs.
Excessive neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation is an important contributor to sepsis-induced acute lung injury (ALI). Recent reports indicate that platelets can induce neutrophil extracellular trap formation. However, the specific mechanism remains unclear. Tph1 gene, which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme for peripheral 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) synthesis, was knocked out in mice to simulate peripheral 5-HT deficiency. Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) surgery was performed to induce sepsis. We found that peripheral 5-HT deficiency reduced NET formation in lung tissues, alleviated sepsis-induced lung inflammatory injury, and reduced the mortality rate of CLP mice. In addition, peripheral 5-HT deficiency was shown to reduce the accumulation of platelets and NETs in the lung of septic mice. We found that platelets from wild-type (WT), but not Tph1 knockout (Tph1(-/-)), mice promote lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced NET formation. Exogenous 5-HT intervention increased LPS-induced NET formation when Tph1(-/-) platelets were co-cultured with WT neutrophils. Therefore, our study uncovers a mechanism by which peripheral 5-HT aggravated sepsis-induced ALI by promoting NET formation in the lung of septic mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据