4.7 Article

A Hybrid Prognostic Method for PEMFC With Aging Parameter Prediction

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TTE.2021.3075531

关键词

Degradation; Fuel cells; Aging; Protons; Predictive models; Computational modeling; Chemicals; Aging prediction; hybrid method; prognostic; proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52007155]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi [2020GY-100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hybrid prognostic approach combining EKF and LSTM can accurately predict the degradation trend of fuel cell voltage and aging parameters, contributing to the extension of the fuel cell lifespan.
Prognostic of the proton-exchange membrane fuel cell can effectively extend the fuel cell lifespan, which can contribute to its large-scale commercialization. In this article, a hybrid prognostic approach is proposed to predict the fuel cell output voltage and other aging parameters that can reflect the stack's internal degradation. During the training stage, the prognostic parameters are obtained by using the extended Kalman filter (EKF). Besides, the fuel cell output voltage is used to train the long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network. During the prediction stage, the hybrid EKF and LSTM method will predict the output voltage and aging parameters, and the degradation can be predicted under dynamic conditions. The proposed method is validated by experimental tests under static, quasi-dynamic, and dynamic conditions. Results indicate that the hybrid method can accurately predict the degradation trend of fuel cell voltage and aging parameters. The RMSE of the method is less than 0.0110, 0.0262, and 0.0317 under static, quasi-dynamic, and dynamic conditions, respectively, which are smaller than the conventional model-based methods or data-driven methods. Furthermore, the hybrid method can provide more detailed information for prognostic decision-making and better prolong the fuel cell lifespan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据