4.7 Article

PLG nanoparticles target fibroblasts and MARCO+ monocytes to reverse multiorgan fibrosis

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.151037

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [1 R21 AR073371]
  2. National Scleroderma Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic orphan disease with a poorly understood pathogenesis. We have found that monocytes and macrophages expressing the scavenger receptor MARCO play a significant role in chronic inflammation and fibrosis in SSc. Treatment with PLG nanoparticles could effectively reduce skin and lung inflammation and fibrosis. In vitro, PLG nanoparticles inhibited TGF-dependent fibrotic responses.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic, multisystem orphan disease with a highly variable clinical course, high mortality rate, and a poorly understood complex pathogenesis. We have identified an important role for a subpopulation of monocytes and macrophages characterized by surface expression of the scavenger receptor macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) in chronic inflammation and fibrosis in SSc and in preclinical disease models. We show that MARCO(+) monocytes and macrophages accumulate in lesional skin and lung in topographic proximity to activated myofibroblasts in patients with SSc and in the bleomycin-induced mouse model of SSc. Short-term treatment of mice with a potentially novel nanoparticle, poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLG), which is composed of a carboxylated, FDA-approved, biodegradable polymer and modulates activation and trafficking of MARCO(+) inflammatory monocytes, markedly attenuated bleomycininduced skin and lung inflammation and fibrosis. Mechanistically, in isolated cells in culture, PLG nanoparticles inhibited TGF-dependent fibrotic responses in vitro. Thus, MARCO(+) monocytes are potent effector cells of skin and lung fibrosis and can be therapeutically targeted in SSc using PLG nanoparticles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据