4.7 Article

A neutrophil/TGF-β axis limits the pathogenicity of allergen-specific CD4+ T cells

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.150251

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH, the NIEHS [ZIA ES102025-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The type of adjuvant used during allergic sensitization has a profound effect on the nature and longevity of the pulmonary inflammation triggered by subsequent reexposure to the same allergen.
The intensity and longevity of inflammatory responses to inhaled allergens is determined largely by the balance between effector and regulatory immune responses, but the mechanisms that determine the relative magnitudes of these opposing forces remain poorly understood. We have found that the type of adjuvant used during allergic sensitization has a profound effect on both the nature and longevity of the pulmonary inflammation triggered by subsequent reexposure to that same provoking allergen. TLR ligand adjuvants and house dust extracts primed immune responses characterized by a mixed neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation that was suppressed by multiple daily allergen challenges. During TLR ligand-mediated allergic sensitization, mice displayed transient airway neutrophilia, which triggered the release of TGF-beta into the airway. This neutrophil-dependent production of TGF-beta during sensitization had a delayed, suppressive effect on eosinophilic responses to subsequent allergen challenge. Neutrophil depletion during sensitization did not affect numbers of Foxp3(+) Tregs but increased proportions of Gata3(+)CD4(+) T cells, which, upon their transfer to recipient mice, triggered stronger eosinophilic inflammation. Thus, a neutrophil/TGF-beta axis acts during TLR-mediated allergic sensitization to fine-tune the phenotype of developing allergen-specific CD4(+) T cells and limit their pathogenicity, suggesting a novel immunotherapeutic approach to control eosinophilia in asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据