相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions
Kevin Gross et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2019)
Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications
Elizabeth L. Pier et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems
Ulf Sandstrom et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2018)
An efficient system to fund science: from proposal review to peer-to-peer distributions
Johan Bollen et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2017)
How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers?
Krist Vaesen et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
Time to tackle the incumbency advantage in science: A survey of scientists shows strong support for funding policies that would distribute funds more evenly among laboratories and thereby benefit new and smaller research groups
Andrea Ballabeni et al.
EMBO REPORTS (2016)
Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel
Nicholas Graves et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)
Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review
David Kaplan et al.
PLOS ONE (2008)
分享论文
