4.6 Article

Site-Specific Photochemical Reaction for Improved C=C Location Analysis of Unsaturated Lipids by Ultraviolet Photodissociation

期刊

RESEARCH
卷 2022, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.34133/2022/9783602

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21627807, 21904079, 21722506]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M631441]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a novel approach to improve the efficiency and sensitivity of ultraviolet photodissociation tandem mass spectrometry (UVPD MS/MS) for structural determination of lipids by incorporating a chromophore to the C=C moiety in fatty acyls. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach in identifying the C=C bond locations in unsaturated lipids from complex lipid extracts.
Unraveling the complexity of the lipidome requires the development of novel approaches to facilitate structural identification and characterization of lipid species with isomer-level discrimination. Ultraviolet photodissociation tandem mass spectrometry (UVPD MS/MS) is a promising tool for structure determination of lipids. The sensitivity of UVPD for lipid analysis however is limited mainly due to weak absorption of UV photons by a C=C. Herein, a C=C site-specific derivatization, the Paterno-Buchi (PB) reaction, was used to incorporate a chromophore to the C=C moiety in fatty acyls, leading to significantly improved UVPD efficiency and sensitivity for pinpointing C=C locations. The wavelength-dependent photodissociation of the PB products demonstrated 4-CF3-benzophenone as the best reagent for UVPD in terms of the efficiency of generating C=C diagnostic fragments and simplicity for C=C location assignments. We demonstrated the effectiveness of this approach for the shotgun profiling of C=C location isomers in different lipid classes from complex lipid extracts, highlighting its potential to advancing the identification of the C=C bond locations in unsaturated lipids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据