4.5 Article

Design of a reference model for fast optimization of photo-electrochemical cells

期刊

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 1489-1498

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1se01671g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most research on photo-electrochemical (PEC) cells for water splitting has been based on simulations and experiments on laboratory scales. This study investigates the effects of stepwise upscaling of PEC cells and develops a computer-aided reference model to predict their behavior on different scales. Machine learning via Bayesian optimization is employed to optimize the simulation model input parameters, resulting in good agreement with measured current-voltage curves.
In research and development of photo-electrochemical (PEC) cells for water splitting, most results up to now are based on simulations and experiments on laboratory scales. However, to make PEC cells attractive for application, scaling up their size and energy efficiency is necessary. Therefore, we investigate the effects of stepwise upscaling of PEC cells. On the experimental level, cells with metal oxide electrodes of different sizes and shapes as well as cell tank geometries are characterized with respect to their surface reactions and photo-current output. In order to predict their behavior on different scales, a computer-aided reference model is developed simultaneously. This is benchmarked by testing various cell sizes and shapes, enabled by fast and cost-efficient fabrication via 3D printing. Machine learning via Bayesian optimization was employed to optimize the PEC cell simulation model input parameters, resulting in very good agreement within a few percent of computed and measured current-voltage curves with Pt-electrodes. Transferring these input parameters to the same cell geometry but with a semiconductor anode, deviations of less than 25% were observed. Here, we present experimental results of the PEC cells, as well as the first drafts of the simulation model and the optimization approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据