4.5 Review

Self-reproducing catalytic micelles as nanoscopic protocell precursors

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS CHEMISTRY
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 870-878

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41570-021-00329-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Minerva Foundation through the grant The emergence and evolution of early life under extreme planetary conditions
  2. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An alternative scenario suggests that reproducing nanoscopic lipid micelles with catalytic capabilities were forerunners of biopolymer-containing protocells, which gains support from experiments and reports on micellar catalysis and autocatalytic proliferation. The possibility of protocellular evolution being seeded by pre-RNA lipid assemblies is substantiated by studies on lipid modifications guiding protocellular complexification.
Protocells at life's origin are often conceived as bilayer-enclosed precursors of life, whose self-reproduction rests on the early advent of replicating catalytic biopolymers. This Perspective describes an alternative scenario, wherein reproducing nanoscopic lipid micelles with catalytic capabilities were forerunners of biopolymer-containing protocells. This postulate gains considerable support from experiments describing micellar catalysis and autocatalytic proliferation, and, more recently, from reports on cross-catalysis in mixed micelles that lead to life-like steady-state dynamics. Such results, along with evidence for micellar prebiotic compatibility, synergize with predictions of our chemically stringent computer-simulated model, illustrating how mutually catalytic lipid networks may enable micellar compositional reproduction that could underlie primal selection and evolution. Finally, we highlight studies on how endogenously catalysed lipid modifications could guide further protocellular complexification, including micelle to vesicle transition and monomer to biopolymer progression. These portrayals substantiate the possibility that protocellular evolution could have been seeded by pre-RNA lipid assemblies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据