4.6 Article

Reversal of RNA toxicity in myotonic dystrophy via a decoy RNA-binding protein with high affinity for expanded CUG repeats

期刊

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 207-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00838-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. ANR (Agence National de la Recherche)
  2. AFM (Association Francaise contre les Myopathies)
  3. Association Institut de Myologie
  4. DIM biotherapies, Paris Ile-de-France Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decoy RNA-binding proteins effectively reverse the toxicity of mutant CUG RNA repeats in myotonic dystrophy, restoring normal RNA splicing and improving disease pathology in cell and mouse models.
RNA-binding proteins acting as decoys for pathogenic expanded CUG RNA repeats reverse the toxicity of the mutant transcripts in muscle cells derived from a patient with myotonic dystrophy type 1 and in a mouse model of the disease. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is an RNA-dominant disease whose pathogenesis stems from the functional loss of muscleblind-like RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which causes the formation of alternative-splicing defects. The loss of functional muscleblind-like protein 1 (MBNL1) results from its nuclear sequestration by mutant transcripts containing pathogenic expanded CUG repeats (CUGexp). Here we show that an RBP engineered to act as a decoy for CUGexp reverses the toxicity of the mutant transcripts. In vitro, the binding of the RBP decoy to CUGexp in immortalized muscle cells derived from a patient with DM1 released sequestered endogenous MBNL1 from nuclear RNA foci, restored MBNL1 activity, and corrected the transcriptomic signature of DM1. In mice with DM1, the local or systemic delivery of the RBP decoy via an adeno-associated virus into the animals' skeletal muscle led to the long-lasting correction of the splicing defects and to ameliorated disease pathology. Our findings support the development of decoy RBPs with high binding affinities for expanded RNA repeats as a therapeutic strategy for myotonic dystrophies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据