4.6 Article

Narrative online guides for the interpretation of digital-pathology images and tissue-atlas data

期刊

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 515-526

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00789-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [U54-CA225088]
  2. Ludwig Center at Harvard
  3. NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30-CA06516]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This Perspective discusses the importance of the software ecosystem for tissue image analysis and emphasizes the need for interactive online guides to help histopathologists make complex images understandable to non-specialists. The concept of software interfaces like Minerva, which integrates multi-omic and tissue-atlas features and can be accessed via web browsers, is introduced to effectively disseminate digital histology data and aid their interpretation.
This Perspective describes the ecosystem of software available for the analysis of tissue images and discusses the need for interactive online guides that help histopathologists make complex images understandable to non-specialists. Multiplexed tissue imaging facilitates the diagnosis and understanding of complex disease traits. However, the analysis of such digital images heavily relies on the experience of anatomical pathologists for the review, annotation and description of tissue features. In addition, the wider use of data from tissue atlases in basic and translational research and in classrooms would benefit from software that facilitates the easy visualization and sharing of the images and the results of their analyses. In this Perspective, we describe the ecosystem of software available for the analysis of tissue images and discuss the need for interactive online guides that help histopathologists make complex images comprehensible to non-specialists. We illustrate this idea via a software interface (Minerva), accessible via web browsers, that integrates multi-omic and tissue-atlas features. We argue that such interactive narrative guides can effectively disseminate digital histology data and aid their interpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据