4.1 Review

Soft-collar use in rehabilitation of whiplash-associated disorders-A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102426

关键词

Neck pain; Whiplash; WAD; Acute; Subacute; Soft-collar

资金

  1. Fund for research, quality and education in physiotherapy practice (Fysioterapipraksisfonden)
  2. Lundbeck Foundation for Health Care Research
  3. Motor Accident Insurance Commission of Queensland
  4. Region Zealand (Exercise First)
  5. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [801790]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In treating Whiplash Associated Disorders, four RCTs showed that an active approach or act-as-usual was more effective than soft-collar treatment, but due to low quality evidence, further research is needed to investigate the combination of soft collar use with an active rehabilitation strategy for acute/subacute WAD.
Background: Active rehabilitation of Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) is favoured over passive modalities such as soft-collars. However, the effectiveness of soft-collar use remains unclear. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of soft-collar use on pain and disability in WAD. Design: Systematic review. Method: Databases (AMED, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PEDro, PsycINFO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus) were searched for guidelines, reviews and RCTs on soft-collar use as part of WAD treatment. Reference lists of reviews and guidelines were screened for additional RCTs. Study quality was rated using the PEDro-scale and overall quality of evidence with GRADE. Results: Four RCTs (n = 409) of fair-good quality (PEDro-scores) were included with three using a soft collar in addition to other conservative treatment while one study compared soft-collar use to act-as-usual. All studies found that an active or act-as-usual approach was more effective in reducing pain intensity compared to softcollar use, confirmed by meta-analysis (two RCTs with data: SMD of -0.80 (-1.20, -0.41)). No studies reported disability outcomes while contrasting results were found between groups regarding total cervical range of motion (two RCTs with data: SMD of 0.16 (-0.21, 0.54)) or rotation (two RCTs with data: SMD of 0.54 (-0.19, 1.27)). Overall quality of the evidence was low to very low. Conclusion: All four RCTs favoured an active approach/act-as-usual over soft-collar treatment. However, due to methodological concerns and low certainty of evidence, future studies investigating soft collar use in combination with an active rehabilitation strategy for acute/subacute WAD are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据