4.0 Article

Two-dimensional Janus group-III ternary chalcogenide monolayer compounds B2XY, Al2XY, and BAlX2 (X, Y = S, Se, Te) with high carrier mobilities

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 138-146

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/bkcs.12440

关键词

2D material; density functional theory; group-III ternary chalcogenide monolayer compounds; Janus-type material

资金

  1. University of Ulsan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural, electronic, and mechanical properties of two-dimensional Janus group-III ternary chalcogenide monolayers were investigated using a first-principles approach based on density functional theory. The feasibility of the entire series of compounds as ingredients in nanoscale electronic devices was comprehensively examined, with specific focus on carrier mobilities. The results showed that B2SSe and BAlSe2 have exceptional electron and hole carrier mobility at room temperature.
First-principles approach based on density functional theory is employed in order to investigate the structural, electronic, and mechanical properties of the two-dimensional Janus group-III ternary chalcogenide monolayer (G3TCM) semiconductor series, B2XY, Al2XY, and BAlX2 (X, Y = S, Se, Te; X not equal Y). The effective masses, band gaps, and carrier mobilities of the entire series of Janus G3TCM compounds are evaluated to comprehensively examine their feasibility as an ingredient in nanoscale electronic device. All the G3TCM compounds proposed in this study are suggested to be realizable based on phonon calculations and estimated mechanical stability. The indirect bandgap of B2XY and Al2XY can be switched to direct bandgap in BAlX2 by constructing Janus-type structure using group-III elements. The computationally obtained carrier mobilities according to the deformation potential theory indicated that B2SSe and BAlSe2 have exceptional electron and hole carrier mobility of 2.02 x 10(4) and 2.58 x 10(5) cm(2) V-1 s(-1), respectively, at room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据