4.6 Article

FDI, technological progress, and green total factor energy productivity: evidence from 281 prefecture cities in China

期刊

ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 11058-11088

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01897-w

关键词

FDI; Technological progress; Green total factor energy productivity; GMM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that Green Total Factor Energy Productivity (GTFEP) at the national level has characteristics of accumulation and sustainability, and is significantly influenced by Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Technological Progress (TP), with FDI promoting GTFEP through TP having an obvious effect. Regionally, FDI can only play a significant role in the central region, and resource-based city policies also have a certain effect on improving GTFEP.
This paper uses the slack-based measure-Malmquist-Luenberger (SBM-ML) method to calculate green total factor energy productivity (GTFEP), constructs a dynamic panel data model to analyse the impact of foreign direct investment (FDI) and technological progress (TP) on GTFEP, and further verifies robustness through heterogeneity tests, quantile regression and a dynamic spatial Durbin model. The main results of this study show that from a national perspective, GTFEP has the characteristics of accumulation and sustainability, and the GTFEP value is positively affected by the value in the previous period. FDI, TP and their interaction term can all contribute significantly to GTFEP, and the effect of FDI in promoting GTFEP through TP is very obvious. The regional heterogeneity test shows that FDI can play a significant role only in the central region, and resource-based city policy can improve GTFEP to a certain extent. The results of quantile regression show that there is a dynamic process of the marginal effects of FDI and TP on GTFEP. The empirical results of the dynamic spatial Durbin model show that the results are still robust after considering spatial factors. Finally, corresponding policy implications are proposed based on the empirical conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据