4.7 Article

NRD: Nicotiana Resistance Database, a Comprehensive Platform of Stress Tolerance in Nicotiana

期刊

AGRONOMY-BASEL
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12020508

关键词

Nicotiana; pathogens; stress tolerance; resistance genes; database

资金

  1. Foundation of Shandong Province Modern Agricultural Technology System Innovation Team [SDAIT-25-01]
  2. Development Research on Selection and Experimental Planting of Cigar Varieties in Xishuangbanna [2019530000241047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified a large number of potential resistance genes in six Nicotiana species, indicating the potential abundance of resistance genes in Nicotiana. Additionally, the analysis of pathogen genome sequences revealed high variability and biodiversity among biotic pathogens. To support resistance research, a user-friendly Nicotiana Resistance Database (NRD) was developed.
Nicotiana is one of the most important economic crops and model plants; however, its growth is affected by various biotic and abiotic stresses. In this study, 27,142 potential resistance genes were identified in six Nicotiana species, belonging to fourteen gene families and transcription factors related to stress resistance. The results indicate that Nicotiana has a potential abundance resistance background to biotic and abiotic stress, and these genes could be used in resistance breeding in the future. Analyzing the genome sequences of 19 pathogens, 5,421,414 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and 1958 Simple Sequence Repeats of pathogens have been obtained. The abundance loci show that the biotic pathogens have a high variability and biodiversity. An open-access database, named the Nicotiana Resistance Database (NRD), has been developed as a user-friendly resistance research platform for Nicotiana. The platform provides theoretical and technical support for the resistance research, including the cultivation of resistant varieties, and the genetics and breeding of Nicotiana and relative species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据