4.5 Article

Comparing pH differential and methanol-based methods for anthocyanin assessments of strawberries

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 2123-2131

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2065

关键词

chloroform fraction; flavonoids; methanol extract; method development; organic solvent; pigments

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [1015372, 2019-38821-29038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anthocyanins are water-soluble polyphenolic pigments found in flowers, vegetables, and fruits, playing critical roles in plant and human health. Spectrophotometric methods are simple and inexpensive ways to quantify anthocyanins in plant tissues, but need to be optimized for different plant materials with the choice between organic solvent-based or pH differential methods.
Anthocyanins are a group of water-soluble polyphenolic pigments found primarily in flowers, vegetables, and fruits. These pigments play critical roles in plant and human health. Spectrophotometric methods are a simple and inexpensive way to quantify anthocyanins in plant tissues. Two main spectrophotometric methods have been developed, organic solvent-based, and pH differential methods. Both of these methods are subject to interference from light-absorbing impurities and need to be optimized for different matrixes of different plant materials. Eight methods have been tested in this experiment to quantify anthocyanins in strawberry fruits. Six organic solvent-based methods tested methanol, chloroform-methanol, and MgO in different ratios. The other two methods were pH differential method and a combination of organic solvent-based and pH differential method. Two methods used organic solvents (methanol and chloroform-methanol) were the best in extracting anthocyanin from strawberry fruits. Adding MgO increased the pH of the extract and was less efficient in anthocyanin extraction. All other methods had lower anthocyanin yield compared with methanol and chloroform-methanol methods and are not recommended for strawberry fruit anthocyanin extraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据