4.7 Article

Systematic Map of Human-Raptor Interaction and Coexistence Research

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani12010045

关键词

conservation social sciences; human dimensions; human-wildlife conflict; illegal shooting; persecution

资金

  1. Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish andWildlife Service [FA20AP12199]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human-raptor interactions are primarily characterized by persecution and habitat disturbance. Most research focuses on the ecological effects of human activities on raptors, while social and cultural causes are relatively understudied. Conducting investigations on human behavior, culture, and politics is imperative for the conservation of raptor species.
Simple Summary Raptors are affected by interactions with humans, primarily in the form of persecution and habitat disturbance. Here, we quantify and characterize empirical literature on human-raptor interactions, inclusive of sociocultural, ecological, natural history, and conservation perspectives. We focus on species, geography, and human-caused mortality to understand the scope of research and directions for future raptor conservation research. Although raptor conservation is intrinsically the study of human behavior and social systems, we found ecological research that focuses on the effects humans have on raptors encompasses the majority of human-raptor interaction research. We stress the need to focus on the causes of human-raptor interactions and suggest that the combination of social, ecological, and management-relevant approaches is best to examine problems and identify solutions. Global raptor conservation relies on humans to establish and improve interaction and coexistence. Human-wildlife interaction research is well-established, but tends to focus on large-bodied, terrestrial mammals. The scope and characteristics of research that explores human-raptor interactions are relatively unknown. As an initial step toward quantifying and characterizing the state of applied, cross-disciplinary literature on human-raptor interactions, we use established systematic map (scoping reviews) protocols to catalog literature and describe trends, identify gaps and biases, and critically reflect on the scope of research. We focus on the peer-reviewed (refereed) literature germane to human-raptor interaction, conflict, tolerance, acceptance, persecution and coexistence. Based on 383 papers retrieved that fit our criteria, we identified trends, biases, and gaps. These include a majority of research taking place within North America and Europe; disproportionately few interdisciplinary and social research studies; interactions focused on indirect anthropogenic mortality; and vague calls for human behavior changes, with few concrete steps suggested, when management objectives are discussed. Overall, we note a predominant focus on the study of ecological effects from human-raptor interactions rather than sociocultural causes, and suggest (as others have in various conservation contexts) the imperative of human behavioral, cultural, and political inquiry to conserve raptor species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据