4.7 Article

Molecular characterization of patulin producing and non-producing Penicillium species in apples from Morocco

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 217, 期 -, 页码 137-140

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.10.019

关键词

Mycotoxins; Patulin; Penicillium; P. expansum; Toxigenic fungi; IDH gene

资金

  1. EU Mare Nostrum (EUMN-III Call) program of the European Union [2011-4050/001-EMA2]
  2. EUMN program [1.04.11.01 UORI]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The isolation of patulin-producing Penicillia in apples collected in different markets in four localities in Morocco is reported. Fungi were identified by beta-tubulin sequencing and further characterized using a specific PCR-based method targeting the isoepoxydon dehydrogenase (IDH) gene to discriminate between patulin-producing and non-producing strains. Production of patulin was also evaluated using standard cultural and biochemical methods. Results showed that 79.5% of contaminant fungi belonged to the genus Penicillium and that Penicillium expansum was the most isolated species (83.9%) followed by Penicillium chrysogenum (similar to 9.7%) and Penicillium crustosum (similar to 6.4%). Molecular analysis revealed that 64.5% of the Penicillium species produced the expected IDH-amplicon denoting patulin production in these strains. However, patulin production was not chemically confirmed in all P. expansum strains. The isolation of IDH-/patulin(+) strains poses the hypothesis that gentisylaldehyde is not a direct patulin precursor, supporting previous observations that highlighted the importance of the gentisyl alcohol in the production of this mycotoxin. Total agreement between IDH-gene detection and cultural/chemical methods employed was observed in 58% of P. expansum strains and for 100% of the other species isolated. Overall the data reported here showed a substantial genetic variability within P. expansum population from Morocco. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据