4.6 Article

Task Offloading Strategy and Simulation Platform Construction in Multi-User Edge Computing Scenario

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10233038

关键词

mobile edge computing; task offloading; game theory; Nash equilibrium

资金

  1. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [2020Z113]
  2. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications) [SKLNST-2021-1-13]
  3. National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University [2020D17]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities project [JUSRP12020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a multi-user task offloading strategy based on game theory, utilizing mobile edge computing technology to solve the issue of insufficient computing resources in vehicular networks, effectively reducing system overhead.
Various types of service applications increase the amount of computing in vehicular networks. The lack of computing resources of the vehicle itself will hinder the improvement of network performance. Mobile edge computing (MEC) technology is an effective computing method that is used to solve this problem at the edge of network for multiple mobile users. In this paper, we propose the multi-user task offloading strategy based on game theory to reduce the computational complexity and improve system performance. The task offloading decision making as a multi-user task offloading game is formulated to demonstrate how to achieve the Nash equilibrium (NE). Additionally, a task offloading algorithm is designed to achieve a NE, which represents an optimal or sub-optimal system overhead. In addition, the vehicular communication simulation frameworks Veins, SUMO model and OMNeT++ are adopted to run the proposed task offloading strategy. Numerical results show that the system overhead of the proposed task offloading strategy can degrade about 24.19% and 33.76%, respectively, in different scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据