4.6 Article

Sustainable Solar Drying of Brewer's Spent Grains: A Comparison with Conventional Electric Convective Drying

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10020339

关键词

natural convection solar dryer; electric convective dryer; brewer's spent grains; waste valorization; artificial neural networks; computational fluid dynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the environmental advantages and disadvantages of using a natural convection solar dryer for the dehydration of spent grains from microbreweries. Suitable models were used to simulate the drying processes under different conditions. The results showed that the natural convection solar dryer had significant environmental benefits in terms of energy consumption and CO2 emissions compared to the conventional electric convective dryer.
Spent grains from microbreweries are mostly formed by malting barley (or malt) and are suitable for a further valorization process. Transforming spent grains from waste to raw materials, for instance, in the production of nontraditional flour, requires a previous drying process. A natural convection solar dryer (NCSD) was evaluated as an alternative to a conventional electric convective dryer (CECD) for the dehydration process of local microbrewers' spent grains. Two types of brewer's spent grains (BSG; Golden ale and Red ale) were dried with both systems, and sustainability indices, specific energy consumption (e(C)), and CO2 emissions were calculated and used to assess the environmental advantages and disadvantages of the NCSD. Then, suitable models (empirical, neural networks, and computational fluid dynamics) were used to simulate both types of drying processes under different conditions. The drying times were 30-85 min (depending on the drying temperature, 363.15 K and 333.15 K) and 345-430 min (depending on the starting daytime hour at which the drying process began) for the CECD and the NCSD, respectively. However, e(C) and CO2 emissions for the CECD were 1.68-1.88 center dot 10(-3) (kW h)/kg and 294.80-410.73 kg/(kW h) for the different drying temperatures. Using the NCSD, both indicators were null, considering this aspect as an environmental benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据