4.6 Article

Modulation of Functional Characteristics of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells by Acellular Preparation of Porcine Hemoglobin

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10010032

关键词

porcine hemoglobin; ATDC5; PB-MSCs; differentiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of porcine hemoglobin on different cell types and found its potential role as a supplement in cell culture, particularly in multilineage differentiation capacity. Through a model of porcine hemoglobin, the findings contribute to improving the understanding of extracellular hemoglobin's influence on MSCs in vivo.
Exploring the potential usage of the acellular preparation of porcine hemoglobin (PHb) isolated from slaughterhouse blood as a cell culture media component, we have tested its effects on the functional characteristics of stromal cells of mesodermal origin. Human peripheral blood mesenchymal stromal cells (PB-MSCs) were used in this study as a primary cell model system, along with three mouse cell lines (ATDC5, MC3T3-E1, and 3T3-L1), which represent more uniform model systems. We investigated the effect of PHb at concentrations of 0.1, 1, and 10 mu M on these cells' proliferation, cycle, and clonogenic and migratory potential, and found that PHb's effect depended on both the cell type and its concentration. At the lowest concentration used (0.1 mu M), PHb showed the least evident impact on the cell growth and migration; hence, we analyzed its effect on mesenchymal cell multilineage differentiation capacity at this concentration. Even under conditions that induce a specific type of MSC differentiation (cultivation in particular differentiation media), PHb modulated chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic differentiation, making it a potential candidate for a supplement of MSC culture. Through a model of porcine hemoglobin, these findings also contribute to improving the knowledge of extracellular hemoglobin's influence on MSCs >in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据