4.6 Article

Recent Advancements in Plant-Derived Nanomaterials Research for Biomedical Applications

期刊

PROCESSES
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10020338

关键词

nanomaterials; nanoparticles; plants; biomedical; drug delivery

资金

  1. Centre of Research for Development, Parul University
  2. King Khalid University [RGP.01-345-42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanotechnology involves multiple disciplines such as engineering, physics, chemistry, and biology. The utilization of metallic nanoparticles in bio-engineering and bio-medicine has attracted attention. Medical nanotechnology research has significant health benefits for humans. However, there are still unresolved issues in the development of nanomaterials to ensure their safety for living organisms. Nanoparticles have unique value in biology and materials science, with various applications, especially in the development of new materials.
Engineering, physics, chemistry, and biology are all involved in nanotechnology, which comprises a wide variety of multidisciplinary scientific field devices. The holistic utilization of metallic nanoparticles in the disciplines of bio-engineering and bio-medicine has attracted a great deal of attention. Medical nanotechnology research can offer immense health benefits for humans. While the advantages of developing nanomaterials have been well documented, it is precisely apparent that there are still some major issues that remain unattended to those need to be resolved immediately so as to ensure that they do not adversely affect living organisms in any manner. The existence of nanoparticles gives them particular value in biology and materials science, as an emerging scientific field, with multiple applications in science and technology, especially with numerous frontiers in the development of new materials. Presented here is a review of recent noteworthy developments regarding plant-derived nanomaterials and their use in the development of medicine and biomedical applications around the world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据