4.7 Article

Towards a better comparability during GMP assessment - Identifying the main parameters that influence the loss of volatile organic compounds from silicone elastomers

期刊

FOOD PACKAGING AND SHELF LIFE
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2021.100758

关键词

Silicones; Siloxanes; Food contact materials; Method evaluation study; Consumer safety; Volatile compounds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicone-based consumer products may contain volatile compounds, mainly residual siloxane oligomers from production processes, which need to be removed by a tempering process to prevent their unwanted release into food. According to BfR recommendation XV, the remaining volatile organic compounds should be less than 0.5% of the total product weight. The gravimetric determination of volatile compounds is feasible with an expanded measurement uncertainty of 25% based on the results of this study.
Silicone-based consumer products may contain volatile compounds, predominantly residual siloxane oligomers from production processes. To avoid unwanted release of these volatiles into food, postproduction removal by a tempering process is necessary and might be mandatory for consumer products - especially food contact materials (FCM). According to BfR recommendation XV tempering is assumed to be sufficient if the remaining volatile organic compounds (VOCs) represent less than 0.5 % of the total product weight, a value chosen 60 years ago indicating good manufacturing practice (GMP). However, the reproducibility and comparability of the respective gravimetric method results may be affected by several parameters including sample conditioning, ventilation in the oven and speed of sample handling. Based on the investigations reported in this work, a method evaluation study with an optimized and in-house validated procedure was conducted to assess its inter-laboratory reproducibility. According to the results, the gravimetric determination of the loss of volatile compounds is feasible with an expanded measurement uncertainty of 25 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据