4.7 Article

Low Blue Dose Photodynamic Therapy with Porphyrin-Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Complexes: In Vitro Study on Human Melanoma Cells

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122130

关键词

photodynamic therapy PDT; porphyrin; iron oxide nanoparticles; melanoma

资金

  1. Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization
  2. CCCDI-UEFISCDI within PNCDI III [PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-4771, PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-072]
  3. Nucleu Programme [16N/08.02.2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effectiveness of iron oxide nanoparticles (gamma-Fe2O3 NPs) functionalized with porphyrin in photodynamic therapy on human cutaneous melanoma cells under blue light exposure. The results demonstrated a significant anti-cancer effect of the functionalized nanoparticles.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness in photodynamic therapy of iron oxide nanoparticles (gamma-Fe2O3 NPs), synthesized by laser pyrolysis technique, functionalized with 5,10,15,20-(Tetra-4-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin tetraammonium (TPPS) on human cutaneous melanoma cells, after only 1 min blue light exposure. The efficiency of porphyrin loading on the iron oxide nanocarriers was estimated by using absorption and FTIR spectroscopy. The singlet oxygen yield was determined via transient characteristics of singlet oxygen phosphorescence at 1270 nm both for porphyrin functionalized nanoparticles and rose bengal used as standard. The irradiation was performed with a LED (405 nm, 1 mW/cm(2)) for 1 min after melanoma cells were treated with TPPS functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles (gamma-Fe2O3 NPs_TPPS) and incubated for 24 h. Biological tests revealed a high anticancer effect of gamma-Fe2O3 NPs_TPPS complexes indi-cated by the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, reduction of cell adhesion, and induction of cell death through ROS generated by TPPS under light exposure. The biological assays were combined with the pharmacokinetic prediction of the porphyrin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据