4.7 Review

Stimuli-Responsive Polymers for Transdermal, Transmucosal and Ocular Drug Delivery

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13122050

关键词

stimuli-responsive polymers; transdermal drug delivery; nasal drug delivery; oromucosal drug delivery; ocular drug delivery; mucoadhesive properties

资金

  1. Collaborative Research grant from Nazarbayev University [021220CRP0722]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the conventional use of oral and intravenous routes for drug administration, they face limitations such as reduced bioavailability and invasiveness. Therefore, alternative delivery routes and modifications to drug formulations using stimuli-responsive polymers can improve drug release and bioavailability.
Despite their conventional and widespread use, oral and intravenous routes of drug administration face several limitations. In particular, orally administered drugs undergo enzymatic degradation in the gastrointestinal tract and first-pass metabolism in the liver, which tend to decrease their bioavailability. Intravenous infusions of medications are invasive, painful and stressful for patients and carry the risk of infections, tissue damage and other adverse reactions. In order to account for these disadvantages, alternative routes of drug delivery, such as transdermal, nasal, oromucosal, ocular and others, have been considered. Moreover, drug formulations have been modified in order to improve their storage stability, solubility, absorption and safety. Recently, stimuli-responsive polymers have been shown to achieve controlled release and enhance the bioavailability of multiple drugs. In this review, we discuss the most up-to-date use of stimuli-responsive materials in order to optimize the delivery of medications that are unstable to pH or undergo primary metabolism via transdermal, nasal, oromucosal and ocular routes. Release kinetics, diffusion parameters and permeation rate of the drug via the mucosa or skin are discussed as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据